Clubbing Seal
Barcelona 2 : Chelsea 2 (agg: 2-3)

‎2-1 tonight. If we don’t make it through for the fifth time in six attempts, leave me alone for 15 months.
Like · · 6 hours ago ·

—————————————————————————

I have literally NEVER BEEN THIS HAPPY!!! Fuck the best team in the world, best fighters ever!
Like · · 3 hours ago ·

My heart is making a strange pulsing. This must be what a miracle feels like.
Like · · 3 hours ago ·

Now can Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal and all those other fans stop telling us we have no ‘history’
Like · · 2 hours ago ·

NEWSFLASH! I’ve realised it’s more than happiness, it’s contentment. Long yearned-for and never realised until now. I think I have closure - only regarding Barcalona though. Now to handle that crippling genital crusting problem!!!
Like · · 2 hours ago ·

Seriously, think about it; inhuries, red card, both central defenders being off, a disallowed goal, a penalty - missed, fights, an amazing goal, terrific attacking and defending, superb goalkeeping, players missing the final, a Torres winner, the best player in the world playing in the best team in the world LOSING.


Tell me that game didn’t have it all?
Like · · about an hour ago ·

ianbrooks:

Ghostbusters 1 & 2 Movie Posters by Brandon Schaefer

Kitten, I think what I’m saying is that sometimes shit happens, someone has to deal with it, and who ya gonna call?

Artist: website / flickr / tumblr

collegehumor:


Cool Milhouse


“Why didn’t we smoke the bowl, Bart? Why didn’t we smoke the bowl?”

collegehumor:

“Why didn’t we smoke the bowl, Bart? Why didn’t we smoke the bowl?”

oatmeal:

Microwaving butter.  From this comic.

oatmeal:

Microwaving butter.  From this comic.

Cracked.com - 8 Actors Who Look Exactly The Same on Every Movie Poster

In Zoolander, Ben Stiller plays a male model who only knows how to make one facial expression in front of a camera: Blue Steel. Most of us have Facebook friends with their own version of Blue Steel — a particular facial expression (or if they’ve had a few drinks, body part) that comes out every time someone tells them to say cheese. Well, it turns out that some of Hollywood’s most iconic actors are no different when it comes to selling their movie. For instance …

#8.
Eddie Murphy Raises His Eyebrow

Eddie Murphy has this thing he can do with his eyebrow that he wants you to check out. It first showed up on the poster for Beverly Hills Cop.

Murphy appears to be looking out at us from inside this fish out of water comedy, and saying, “You believe these Hollywood assholes?

Then he brought it out for The Golden Child, where he used it to say, “You believe these Chinese assholes?

But recently, he seems to be using his eyebrow to express disbelief at the circumstances of his career, since he only seems to break it out for the posters of his absolute worst movies.


You believe these Hollywood assholes paid me to make this movie?”

He doesn’t break it out for Dr. Dolittle. But on Dr. Doolittle 2


Eyebrow.

Could it be that somewhere deep inside Eddie Murphy, the comedic genius from the 80s is still alive? Like Axl Foley, Murphy’s inner genius can’t believe the shit these Hollywood assholes are putting him through. Maybe he’s trying to signal out to us, like the guy in Diving Bell and the Butterfly but with more expressive eyebrows.

Do you think that theory’s too far fetched, Mr. Nash?


Eyebrow?

Huh. So to recap …

#7.
Jean-Claude Van Damme is Always Flexing His Right Arm

Of course having a go-to look requires some talent or, at the very least, the ability to emote. Lacking that, a favorite body part will do. For instance, Jean-Claude Van Damme desperately wants to show you his right arm. And he swears he’s not flexing. Although …

… that’s not technically an athletic stance in anything that’s not body building.

And even in body building, that’s not considered anything but a dance move.

You can actually track the rise and fall of Van Damme’s career by how focused the movie’s poster is on his right bicep. For instance, despite Van Damme’s best efforts, the art director of this early poster seemed to miss the point …


“Why does he keep yelling ‘Not the face, the BOOM!’ at me?”

The art director of Black Eagle had the nerve to cover his right bicep with a small Asian man — either out of spite or because he was tired of trying to make a fight scene out of what is clearly just JCVD doing his hair.

But at the height of his career, they look like propaganda posters from a fascist dictatorship that is ruled by the muscles of Van Damme’s right arm.


“Yes, very impressive Mr. Van Damme. But you’ve been standing like that for six straight hours flexing and unflexing your arm. Everyone’s hungry.”

By the end they were clearly just sticking a gun in his hand while he flexed his right bicep, and trying to take the picture before he noticed. This strategy was clearly at work on the hilarious poster for Double Team


He is either flexing or he was putting on a top hat that magically transformed into a handgun.

When it was announced that JCVD would be starring as two twins in the film Double Impact, fans assumed they would finally get a chance to see another side of Van Damme, or at least his left bicep.


What are you hiding Van Damme?

Finally, when his career had fallen apart and he’d lost the right to say which arm he gets to show off, we learn the horrifying secret he’s been keeping. His left arm.


It looks like they photo shopped his head onto Frank Costanza’s body.

#6.
Jackie Chan’s Fist/Foot is Always Bigger Than His Head

Other martial arts experts don’t care which of their body parts you’re looking at, as long as it appears to be bigger than their head. Jackie Chan loves showing us how much bigger his giant fist and/or foot are than his head — whether he’s showing off his impressive punching power by breaking through paper …

Punching through a tape measurer, and possible mistranslation of “red tape” …

Breaking new ground in the world of 19th-century British male cheerleading …

Or indirectly setting women’s right to bear arms back millenia.

On the poster for his movie with Jennifer Love Hewitt (who appears wearing exactly what audiences have always wanted to see her in: a sensible pant suit), his foot and the area behind his head are vectorized to ensure nobody’s confused about which one’s bigger.

None of this movie takes place inside of Tron. It’s about a magic tuxedo. The only reason for that effect is to ensure you know how much bigger Jackie Chan foot is than his head.

#5.
Denzel Washington is Avoiding Eye Contact

Denzel never looks directly at the camera when his intensity gland is active, presumably because he knows how many people it would blind. Early in his career he spread his drama lasers around, making the horizon tremble on Remember the Titans


Somewhere in the sky behind you, a bird’s heart just exploded.

On the poster for The Hurricane, he looked down, and thousands of women went into labor and found out they were pregnant at the same moment.


The babies all emerged morally outraged and sexually aroused.

He was still searching for the perfect place to look in 2001 on the poster for the movie Training Day, when he looked somewhere off to his right at some bullshit that was hardly worth his time …


“Now this is some bullshit.”

When he won an Oscar for the role, Denzel and the people who make his movies took note, leading to a rash of movie posters that seemed designed only to make us glad we weren’t standing two feet to our left.


Denzel is not taking anymore shit from whom or whatever is standing to our left …


… and neither is his mustache.

Sometimes, he seems to be asking whatever is over there a question.


“How am I going to sex my way out of this one?”


“Why is half of my face disintegrating?”


“Is Travolta acting via ridiculous facial hair again?”

But mostly he’s just pissed, and unwilling to stand idly by while whatever it is continues to happen over there.


“Why can’t you be more like whatever is happening off the right edge of the poster?”

Of course, there’s probably some rule of photographic construction that says that dignity must be exuded off the left edge of the photograph, right?

Will Smith Maintains Eye Contact at All Costs

Actually, Will Smith and the millions of dollars every single one of his movies makes at the box office beg to differ. They also beg to peer INTO YOUR SOUL!

But unlike Zoolander, Smith has had a second look from the start: a goofy grin that seems to say, “Your daughter is safe with me, sir.”


Or son, as the case may be.

#3.
Jet Li Only Owns One Pair of Sunglasses

Sure Jet Li makes the same facial expression on every single movie poster. But that could be said about every single frame of every movie he’s ever appeared in. The man isn’t here to smile or crack wise.

Really, the only reason we include Li is because we feel sorry for him, and hope that between the lot of them, his co-stars can chip in and buy him a new pair of sunglasses.


Same …


… pair …


… every …


… time.

#2.
Bruce Willis Hides Half His Face, or Tilts to the Right

Bruce Willis’ look has been a work in progress. From 1988 to 1995 Bruce Wills was not allowed to show more than half of his face on the poster of any major motion picture.

Then from 2002 to 2003 there was his short-lived attempt to become the go-to guy when you needed a soldier’s head to loom over an aerial bombardment …

But on the poster for Die Hard reject Hostage, he saw something he liked.

Not the borderline cartoon-ish De Niro impression, but the precise angle of his bald head, cocked slightly towards his left shoulder. He liked it so much that he cocked his head at the exact same angle on every single one of the posters for Hostage.

And then on the posters for his next two movies.

When the designers of his next two movie posters tried to shoot him standing up straight, he apparently had someone tilt the posters so he appeared to be listing to his left.

Again, we must be seeing some larger rule in play here that applies to other actors equally, right? We’ll let Morgan Freeman, John Malkovich and Helen Mirren take that one.

#1.
Tom Cruise Shows Only the Right Side of His Face

Look, we’re not going to claim that Tom Cruise is the inspiration for Derek Zoolander. The guy is obviously capable of having an intelligent thought once in a while.

Sure Cruise was illiterate for most of his life, like Zoolander.

And sure, Ben Stiller does love making fun of Cruise.

But it’s not like Cruise only has one look, or worse yet, one side of his face from which he can sell a movie poster.

Because that would just about seal it.

OK, Tom Cruise was totally the inspiration for Zoolander. Hell, he might be the inspiration for Two Face. Not only does he only have one look, he might not even have a left side to his face.

What a dork. Hey everyone. Let’s laugh at Tom Cruise!


Read more: 8 Actors Who Look Exactly The Same on Every Movie Poster | Cracked.com http://www.cracked.com/article_19093_8-actors-who-look-exactly-same-every-movie-poster_p2.html#ixzz1mGw9qe5c
Cracked.com - FAN THEORY THAT MAKES THE MOVIE BETTER: Ferris Bueller’s Day Off Was All in Cameron’s Head

This beloved 1986 John Hughes teen comedy tells the story of three good friends playing hooky; the affable and impossibly popular Ferris Bueller, the chronically depressed Cameron and Ferris’s girlfriend, the stone-cold Sloane. Together, they embark upon the most exciting non-sex-and-booze-and-pot filled day a bunch of attractive American teens could ever wish for.

The Theory:

Cameron creates Ferris in his mind. Ferris is the total opposite of Cameron: he’s fun, spontaneous and has a loving family and foxy girlfriend. At the beginning of the film, the imaginary Ferris convinces a bed-ridden Cameron to “borrow” his dad’s Ferrari 250 GT California and cruise all over Chicago. Given Cameron’s crushing social incompetence, it’s likely that Sloane is fictional too and represents a girl that he has a crush on.

This theory explains the more fantastic elements of the film. For example, the whole city of Chicago rallies around the “sick” Ferris. This represents Cameron’s miserable home life and how he yearns for friends and family who give a shit. Or, perhaps Bueller is a guy Cameron knows but isn’t friends with, and his fantasy is based on what he imagines life to be like for the “popular” kids at school—everything is easy and the world revolves around them.

Or maybe it’s a secret metaphor for how Cameron wants to grow up to be Inspector Gadget.


“Gotta get home before my parents do!”

When Cameron accidentally trashes his father’s Ferrari at the film’s climax, he realizes that he needs to stick up to his father and take responsibility for his own life. At this point he “disposes” of Ferris and Sloane. Both of his fictional friends receive happy endings: Sloane is left pondering marrying Ferris, whereas Ferris safely returns home, where he can break the fourth wall for eternity.

Why does it make the film better?

It transforms Ferris Bueller into a Brat Pack version of Fight Club. Remember when Ferris keeps pestering Cameron to pick him up? Let’s watch that scene again…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdcFYNe9U7A&feature=player_embedded

Holy shit. That kid is fucked up. He needs a friend. A friend who is everything he is not, a friend who can liberate him from all of his self-imposed limitations. Somewhere, there’s probably a rejected script for a sequel where “Bueller” convinces Cameron to climb up a clock tower with a rifle.


Read more: 6 Insane Fan Theories That Actually Make Great Movies Better | Cracked.com http://www.cracked.com/article/18367_6-insane-fan-theories-that-actually-make-great-movies-better/#ixzz1mGsjEU7l


‘Who Will Be The Next England Manager?’ Venn Diagram

‘Who Will Be The Next England Manager?’ Venn Diagram

Charlie Brooker: When the Daily Mail calls rightwingers stupid, the result is dumbogeddon

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/feb/05/daily-mail-calls-rightwingers-stupid

There was a minor kerfuffle a few weeks ago when the Daily Mail website overtook the New York Times to become the most popular news site in the world. Liberals can whine all they like, but that’s a formidable achievement, especially considering it’s not really a conventional news site at all, more a big online bin full of pictures of reality stars, with the occasional Stephen Glover column lobbed in to lighten the mood.

The print edition of the paper is edited by Paul Dacre, who is regularly praised by media types for knowing what his customers want, and then selling it to them. This is an extraordinary skill that puts him on the same rarefied level as, say, anyone who works in a shoe shop. Or a bike shop. Or any kind of shop. Or in any absolutely any kind of business whatsoever. Whatever you think about Dacre’s politics, you can’t deny he’s got a job to do, and he does it. Like a peg. Or a ladle. Or even a knee. Dacre is perhaps Britain’s foremost knee.

Curiously, the online version of the Mail has become a hit by doing the reverse of what Dacre is commended for doing. It succeeds by remorselessly delivering industrial quantities of precisely the opposite of what a traditional Mail reader would presumably want to read: frothy stories about carefree young women enjoying themselves. Kim Kardashian or Kelly Brook “pour their curves” into a selection of tight dresses and waddle before the lens and absolutely nobody on the planet gives a toss apart from Mail Online, which is doomed to host the images, and Mail Online’s readers, who flock in their thousands to leave messages claiming to be not in the slightest bit interested in the story they’re reading and commenting on.

Now Mail Online has gone one step further by running a story that not only insults its own readers, but cruelly invites them to underline the insult by making fools of themselves. In what has to be a deliberate act of “trolling”, last Friday it carried a story headlined “Rightwingers are less intelligent than left wingers, says study”. In terms of enraging your core readership, this is the equivalent of Nuts magazine suddenly claiming only gay men masturbate to Hollyoaks babes.

The Mail’s report went on to detail the results of a study carried out by a group of Canadian academics, which appears to show some correlation between low childhood intelligence and rightwing politics. It also claimed that stupid people hold rightwing views in order to feel “safe”. Other items they hold in order to feel safe include clubs, rocks and dustbin lids. But those are easy to let go of. Political beliefs get stuck to your hands. And the only way to remove them is to hold your brain under the hot tap and scrub vigorously for several decades.

As you might expect, many Mail Online readers didn’t take kindly to a report that strived to paint them as simplistic, terrified dimwits. Many leapt from the tyres they were swinging in to furrow their brows and howl in anger. Others, tragically, began tapping rudimentary responses into the comments box. Which is where the tragi-fun really began.

“Stupidest study of them all,” raged a reader called Beth. “So were the testers conservative for being so thick or were they left and using a non study to make themselves look better?” Hmmm. There’s no easy answer to that. Because it doesn’t make sense.

“I seem to remember ‘academics’ once upon a time stating that the world was flat and the Sun orbitted the Earth,” scoffed Ted, who has presumably been keeping his personal brand of scepticism alive since the middle ages.

“Sounds like a BBC study, type of thing they would waste the Licence fee on, load of Cods wallop,” claimed Terry from Leicester, thereby managing to ignore the findings while simultaneously attacking public service broadcasting for something it hadn’t done. For his next trick, Terry will learn to whistle and shit at the same time.

Not all the respondents were stupid. Some were merely deluded. Someone calling themselves “Hillside” from Sydney claimed: “I have an IQ over 200, have six degrees and diplomas and am ‘right-wing’, as are others I know at this higher level of intelligence.” His IQ score is particularly impressive considering the maximum possible score on Mensa’s preferred IQ test is 161.

Whatever the numbers: intellectual dick-measuring isn’t to everyone’s tastes anyway. Simply by highlighting his own intelligence “Hillside” alienated several of his commentbox brethren.

“If there is one person I can not stand and that is a snob who thinks they are intelligent because if they were intelligent and educated they wouldn’t be snobs,” argued Liz from London. Once you’ve clambered over the broken grammar, deliberately placed at the start of the sentence like a rudimentary barricade of piled-up chairs, there’s a tragic conundrum at work here. She claims intellectual snootiness is ugly, which it is, but unfortunately she says it in such a stupid way it’s impossible for anyone smarter than a steak-and-ale pie not to look down on her. Thus, for Liz, the crushing cycle of snobbery continues.

On and on the comments went, turning a rather stark write-up of a daft-sounding study into a sublime piece of live online performance art. A chimps’ tea party of the damned. The Mail has long been a master at trolling lefties; now it’s mischievously turned on its own readers, and the results could only be funnier if the website came with free plastic lawn furniture for them to lob at the screen. You couldn’t make it up.

A Letter To Homeland Security

Holidaymakers have been warned to watch their words after two friends were refused entry to the US on security grounds after a tweet.

Before his trip, Leigh Van Bryan wrote that he was going to “destroy America”.

He insisted he was referring to simply having a good time - but was sent home.

In another tweet, Mr Bryan made reference to comedy show Family Guy saying that he would be in LA in three weeks, annoying people “and diggin’ Marilyn Monroe up”.

After the interview, Homeland Security reported: “Mr Bryan confirmed that he had posted on his Tweeter website account that he was coming to the United States to dig up the grave of Marilyn Monroe.

“Also on his tweeter account Mr Bryan posted he was coming to destroy America.”

So I wrote to them;

Good morning,

I saw this news story posted on the BBC website today and just wanted to inquire whether all of the US was totally hysterical and massively heavy-handed, or is it just Homeland Security?

After showing a complete and total ignorance, disregard and, frankly, pathetic attitude toward a (admittedly rather unoriginal)  holidaymaker making a clear reference in the local vernacular, it’s a wonder that you continue to exist as a viable organisation as it seems to me that you have all clearly disappeared up your collective arse.

I truly have nothing against the US and HS, but you have to admit, this really doesn’t do anything for your reputation as a ham-fisted, bureaucratic, over-reacting and hypocritical bundle of dogmatists.

I do hope you take this message as it’s intended; a plea for some sense of proportion from what we are led to believe is ‘the most powerful nation on earth.’

Have a nice day.

True

True